That’s About Four Fish
October 3, 2008
The National Confectioners Association released a statement last week trumpeting the confectionary trend toward portion-controlled candy packs. Just in time for Halloween, adults can now slyly remind fat kids that candy won’t really make them happy…I guess.
Isn’t it counter-intuitive to offer 100-calorie packs of Swedish Fish and Sour Patch Kids when the primary goal of Halloween is to horde as much candy as humanly possible? Bringing home a haul of six pounds of 100-calorie packs will hardly deter a ravenous tot from eating four pounds before bedtime (and the remaining two pounds for breakfast).
If members of the NCA are really trying to help kids develop sensible eating habits, that’s great. I think it’s a parent’s role to instill children with respect for a diet of reasonable portions of diverse, healthy foods, but if diet fad mentality helps, well alright.
But as far as I’m concerned, 100-calorie packs make it much easier to tabulate by exactly how much I’ve ruined my appetite. 16 x 100? That’s my kinda math!
Tainted Candy In CT
October 3, 2008
Hartford, Connecticut’s WFSB reports of Melamine-Tained Candy Found in CT
You’d think that with a name like White Rabbit you’d just about expect some sort of crazy chemical to be present. Go ask Alice.
In all seriousness, though, these candies are imported from China and do not reflect the candy making efforts of American companies. Products tainted with melamine are typically manufactured and distributed in Asian countries, Australia and perhaps New Zealand. Candies marketed in the US and Western Europe are manufactured elsewhere.
Cadbury chocolate manufactured in the company Beijing factory has melamine present, but not in levels sufficient to harm consumers. Regardless, Cadbury has voluntarily recalled the products. Other foodstuffs of Asian origin, including Pocky and Nabisco cracker cheese sandwiches–again, NOT sold in the United States–have shown elevated and sometimes dangerous levels of melamine. Products sold under these brand names are manufactured elsewhere and do not demonstrate risk of melamine contamination.
Sugar Boost
October 3, 2008
I have an absolutely airtight alibi, I swear.
Dylan’s Candy Bar, New York’s chic sugar shop, recently lost $7000 in a late-night stick-up. Sour thug robs high-end sweet shop
The man burst into the store and took cash? Did he not notice the decor? Had I robbed the place the authorities would’ve nabbed me in about 12 minutes–follow the trail of Big Hunk wrappers and the sound of maddened glee, coppers.

Dutch Help Justify Unhealthy Snacking
October 3, 2008
There’s always fruit in my apartment, but of course there’s always candy too. More often than not the fruit gets tossed. I almost always run out of candy.
Dutch researchers at Wageningen University in the Netherlands can help explain this Grand Canyon-esque gulf between my intentions and what I end up doing. Why we simply can’t resist “sinful” snacks
Basically, the parts of our brain that note intentions and dictate impulse don’t cooperate. So while an individual knows rationally that, say, a handful of grapes are a more rewarding snack, it shouldn’t be a surprise when they reach for a convenience food or something more immediately gratifying like a donut.
It’s a great scapegoat if you can’t stick with your diet, but can this be applied to other aspects of our lives? Like, the part of my brain that notes time isn’t communicating with the part that cares whether or not I’m late for work, so it’s not my fault? It’s my noggin needin’ rewiring?







